Questo sito utilizza cookies. Se continui la navigazione significa che approvi i nostri termini di utilizzo di cookies. Per saperne di più, leggi qui.

Hypothesis

Find a hypothesis, data, and a CHI community

Modifiche a "Operationalizing and Measuring online democratic deliberation with hybrid methods and open participation."

Modalità di visualizzazione confronto:
Modalità visualizzazione HTML:

Corpo del testo

  • -["
    Context
    Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized.
    Hypothesis
    Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?
    Collaboration
    Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---> activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.
    Related data
    We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim
    Indicators
    Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth
    Evaluation
    Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)
    "]
  • +["
    Context
    Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.
    Hypothesis
    Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?
    Collaboration
    Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---> activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.
    Related data
    We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim
    Indicators
    Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth
    Evaluation
    Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)
    "]
  • -["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.7.2\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div>Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related data</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)</div></dd></dl></xml>"]
  • +["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.7.2\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div>Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related data</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)</div></dd></dl></xml>"]
Eliminazioni
  • -["
    Context
    Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized.
    Hypothesis
    Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?
    Collaboration
    Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.
    Related data
    We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim
    Indicators
    Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth
    Evaluation
    Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)
    "]
Aggiunte
  • +["
    Context
    Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.
    Hypothesis
    Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?
    Collaboration
    Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.
    Related data
    We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim
    Indicators
    Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth
    Evaluation
    Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)
    "]
Eliminazioni
  • -["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.7.2\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div>Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related data</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)</div></dd></dl></xml>"]
Aggiunte
  • +["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.7.2\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div>Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related data</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)</div></dd></dl></xml>"]
Numero della versione 2 di 2 Mostra tutte le versioni Torna alla proposta
Autore della versione
Avatar: Olivier Schulbaum Olivier Schulbaum
Versione creata il 23/11/2021 16:06